ip private

ip privateThe Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has directed the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) to reserve the following IPv4 address ranges for private networks, as published in RFC 1918^[1]:

RFC1918 name	IP address range	number of addresses	classful description	largest CIDR block (subnet mask)	host id size
24-bit block	10.0.0.0 – 10.255.255.255	16,777,216	single class A	10.0.0.0/8 (255.0.0.0)	24 bits
20-bit block	172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255	1,048,576	16 contiguous class Bs	172.16.0.0/12 (255.240.0.0)	20 bits
16-bit block	192.168.0.0 – 192.168.255.255	65,536	256 contiguous class Cs	192.168.0.0/16 (255.255.0.0)	16 bits

Classful addressing is obsolete and has not been used in the Internet since the implementation of Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) starting in 1993. For example, while 10.0.0.0/8 was a single class A network, it is common for organizations to divide it into smaller /16 or /24 networks.

] Private IPv6 addresses

The concept of private networks and special address reservation for such networks has been carried over to the next generation of the Internet Protocol, IPv6.
The address block fc00::/7 has been reserved by IANA as described in RFC 4193. These addresses are called Unique Local Addresses (ULA). They are defined as being unicast in character and contain a 40-bit random number in the routing prefix to prevent collisions when two private networks are interconnected. Despite being inherently local in usage, the IPv6 address scopes of unique local addresses is global.
A former standard proposed the use of so-called "site-local" addresses in the fec0::/10 range, but due to major concerns about scalability and the poor definition of what constitutes a site, its use has been deprecated since September 2004 by RFC 3879.

] Link-local addresses

Main article: Zero configuration networking

See also: Link-local address

Another type of private networking uses the link-local address range codified in RFC 5735 and RFC 3927. The utility of these addresses is in self-autoconfiguration by network devices when Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) services are not available and manual configuration by a network administrator is not desirable.
In IPv4, the block 169.254/16 is reserved for this purpose, with the exception of the first and the last /24 subnet in the range. If a host on an IEEE 802 (ethernet) network cannot obtain a network address via DHCP, an address from 169.254.1.0 to 169.254.254.255 may be assigned pseudorandomly. The standard prescribes that address collisions must be handled gracefully.
The IPv6 addressing architecture sets aside the block fe80::/10 for IP address autoconfiguration.

Common uses

The most common use of private addresses is in residential networks, since most Internet service providers (ISPs) only allocate a single routable IP address to each residential customer, but many homes have more than one networked device. In this situation, a network address translator (NAT) gateway is usually used to provide Internet connectivity to multiple hosts.
Private addresses are also commonly used in corporate networks, which for security reasons, are not connected directly to the Internet. Often a proxy, SOCKS gateway, or similar devices are used to provide restricted Internet access to network-internal users.
In both cases, private addresses are often seen as enhancing network security for the internal network, since it is difficult for an Internet host to connect directly to an internal system.

] Misrouting

It is not uncommon for packets originating in private address spaces to be misrouted onto the Internet. Private networks often do not properly configure DNS services for addresses used internally and attempt reverse DNS lookups for these addresses, causing extra traffic to the Internet root nameservers. The AS112 project attempted to mitigate this load by providing special blackhole anycast nameservers for private address ranges which only return negative result codes (not found) for these queries.
Organizational edge routers are usually configured to drop ingress IP traffic for these networks, which can occur either by misconfiguration, or from malicious traffic using a spoofed source address. Less commonly, ISP edge routers drop such egress traffic from customers, which reduces the impact to the Internet of such misconfigured or malicious hosts on the customer's network.

] Merging private networks

Since the private address space is relatively small, many private networks use the same address space. This creates a common problem when merging such networks, namely the duplication of addresses on multiple devices. In this case, networks or hosts must be renumbered, often a time-consuming task, or a network address translator must be placed between the networks to masquerade the duplicated addresses.

] Private use of other reserved addresses

Historically other address blocks than the private address ranges have been reserved for other potential future uses. Some organizations have used them for private networking applications despite official warnings of possible future address collisions.

] RFC References

• RFC 1918 – "Address Allocation for Private Internets"
• RFC 2036 – "Observations on the use of Components of the Class A Address Space within the Internet"
• RFC 2050 – "Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines"
• RFC 2101 – "IPv4 Address Behaviour Today"
• RFC 2663 – "IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations"
• RFC 3022 – "Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT)"
• RFC 3330 – "Special-Use IPv4 Addresses" (superseded)
• RFC 5735 – "Special-Use IPv4 Addresses"
• RFC 3879 – "Deprecating Site Local Addresses"
• RFC 3927 – "Dynamic Configuration of IPv4 Link-Local Addresses"
• RFC 4193 – "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"